<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greenwich Becomes Royal Borough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/02510-greenwich-becomes-royal-borough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/02510-greenwich-becomes-royal-borough/</link>
	<description>The Portal For Greenwich Residents, Businesses and Visitors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:37:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/02510-greenwich-becomes-royal-borough/comment-page-1/#comment-12975</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=2510#comment-12975</guid>
		<description>Ian,
There is already a plan being developed to pedestrainise the centre of Greenwich You can find sketches on their site. 

Indigo
You must have had the council press release in front of you. Nearly word perfect. lol

My view. 
Well while it may be an honour (of sorts) I do not feel it will make any difference to the area. After 40 years of Labour rule - yes the last time the Conservatives were elected was 1968 - we seem to be no better off in in many areas we have gone backwards. 

Oh bring on the Olympics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian,<br />
There is already a plan being developed to pedestrainise the centre of Greenwich You can find sketches on their site. </p>
<p>Indigo<br />
You must have had the council press release in front of you. Nearly word perfect. lol</p>
<p>My view.<br />
Well while it may be an honour (of sorts) I do not feel it will make any difference to the area. After 40 years of Labour rule &#8211; yes the last time the Conservatives were elected was 1968 &#8211; we seem to be no better off in in many areas we have gone backwards. </p>
<p>Oh bring on the Olympics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/02510-greenwich-becomes-royal-borough/comment-page-1/#comment-12580</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=2510#comment-12580</guid>
		<description>Should be good for property prices, up, up and up, I think to celebrate we should permanently pedestrianise the town centre blocking all through traffic seven days per week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should be good for property prices, up, up and up, I think to celebrate we should permanently pedestrianise the town centre blocking all through traffic seven days per week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indigo</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/02510-greenwich-becomes-royal-borough/comment-page-1/#comment-12561</link>
		<dc:creator>Indigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=2510#comment-12561</guid>
		<description>@steve January 7th, 2010 11:15 am

It is nothing to do with the Olympics.

Her Majesty has graciously agreed &quot;as a mark of royal favour, to confer royal borough status on the London borough of Greenwich. This rare honour is to be bestowed in recognition of the historically close links forged between Greenwich and our royal family from the middle ages to the present day, and of the borough&#039;s global significance as the home of the prime meridian, Greenwich mean time and a UNESCO world heritage site.&quot; (Ian Lucas, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Business and Regulatory Reform), Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, speaking in the Queen&#039;s Diamond Jubilee debate in the House of Commons, 5 January 2010.)

See - links between Greenwich and the royal family since the Middle Ages, home of the prime meridian (since, I think, 1886), and being a World Heritage Site.  Nothing so crappy and temporary and obscenely expensive as the Olympics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@steve January 7th, 2010 11:15 am</p>
<p>It is nothing to do with the Olympics.</p>
<p>Her Majesty has graciously agreed &#8220;as a mark of royal favour, to confer royal borough status on the London borough of Greenwich. This rare honour is to be bestowed in recognition of the historically close links forged between Greenwich and our royal family from the middle ages to the present day, and of the borough&#8217;s global significance as the home of the prime meridian, Greenwich mean time and a UNESCO world heritage site.&#8221; (Ian Lucas, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Business and Regulatory Reform), Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, speaking in the Queen&#8217;s Diamond Jubilee debate in the House of Commons, 5 January 2010.)</p>
<p>See &#8211; links between Greenwich and the royal family since the Middle Ages, home of the prime meridian (since, I think, 1886), and being a World Heritage Site.  Nothing so crappy and temporary and obscenely expensive as the Olympics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/02510-greenwich-becomes-royal-borough/comment-page-1/#comment-12558</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=2510#comment-12558</guid>
		<description>This is excellent news... yet another legacy of having the 2012 Games in Greenwich:)

Now just waiting for more good news of the planning permission for the equestrian event being granted! Bring it on... Greenwich is changing and it&#039;s about time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is excellent news&#8230; yet another legacy of having the 2012 Games in Greenwich:)</p>
<p>Now just waiting for more good news of the planning permission for the equestrian event being granted! Bring it on&#8230; Greenwich is changing and it&#8217;s about time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Rhind</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/02510-greenwich-becomes-royal-borough/comment-page-1/#comment-12524</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Rhind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=2510#comment-12524</guid>
		<description>While it may be nice to award Greenwich Royal borough status I am not sure whether the lads and lasses with such bright ideas ever think through what they propose, probably solely for some transient PR reason.  Certainly not by using their common sense. After all, Greenwich has been the Royal Manor of East Greenwich since before Elizabeth I took the throne. 

Greenwich in recent decades has been called Greenwich Borough Council, the London Borough of Greenwich and is now plain old Greenwich Council. Each time the name changes the long-suffering Council Tax payer stumps up for all the new letterheads, public signs, street names, a bit of Mayor’s chain of office, departmental memorandum sheets, all local school books and sign boards, and all the other tiresome its and bits which need amendment. An expert graphics designer will be required and his/her fee won’t be small. Remember London Transport’s translation into Transport for London when Ken Livingstone was in charge.  It cost a fortune of our money and made no difference whatsoever in keeping the trains and buses running on time. 

If Greenwich is to become a Royal borough what will it be called?  Surely nothing as drab as Royal Greenwich Council - and will Government hand over a large bag of cash to effect the changes?  The money could come out of the £42m budget for the Equestrian Olympics in Greenwich.  Now that would be a heritage gain out of 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it may be nice to award Greenwich Royal borough status I am not sure whether the lads and lasses with such bright ideas ever think through what they propose, probably solely for some transient PR reason.  Certainly not by using their common sense. After all, Greenwich has been the Royal Manor of East Greenwich since before Elizabeth I took the throne. </p>
<p>Greenwich in recent decades has been called Greenwich Borough Council, the London Borough of Greenwich and is now plain old Greenwich Council. Each time the name changes the long-suffering Council Tax payer stumps up for all the new letterheads, public signs, street names, a bit of Mayor’s chain of office, departmental memorandum sheets, all local school books and sign boards, and all the other tiresome its and bits which need amendment. An expert graphics designer will be required and his/her fee won’t be small. Remember London Transport’s translation into Transport for London when Ken Livingstone was in charge.  It cost a fortune of our money and made no difference whatsoever in keeping the trains and buses running on time. </p>
<p>If Greenwich is to become a Royal borough what will it be called?  Surely nothing as drab as Royal Greenwich Council &#8211; and will Government hand over a large bag of cash to effect the changes?  The money could come out of the £42m budget for the Equestrian Olympics in Greenwich.  Now that would be a heritage gain out of 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLJAIKJ</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/02510-greenwich-becomes-royal-borough/comment-page-1/#comment-12515</link>
		<dc:creator>PLJAIKJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=2510#comment-12515</guid>
		<description>When Raynsford refers to the hosting of the equestrian events in Greenwich Park, does he not mean PROPOSED hosting since this is subject to planning permission? Or has he fixed it?

Also the press release on this royal status from Greenwich Council has notes to editors, which say in para 5: &quot;Greenwich Park will host the equestrian events&quot;.
 Is the planning application process just a multi-million pound charade if permission is a foregone conclusion? 

Perhaps Czarist Borough of Greenwich may be a more appropriate title!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Raynsford refers to the hosting of the equestrian events in Greenwich Park, does he not mean PROPOSED hosting since this is subject to planning permission? Or has he fixed it?</p>
<p>Also the press release on this royal status from Greenwich Council has notes to editors, which say in para 5: &#8220;Greenwich Park will host the equestrian events&#8221;.<br />
 Is the planning application process just a multi-million pound charade if permission is a foregone conclusion? </p>
<p>Perhaps Czarist Borough of Greenwich may be a more appropriate title!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSFCE</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/02510-greenwich-becomes-royal-borough/comment-page-1/#comment-12511</link>
		<dc:creator>MSFCE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=2510#comment-12511</guid>
		<description>Trust Raynsford to shoot his mouth off.  In Simon Hoggart&#039;s Guardian sketch today he says that &quot;we learned that there would be no link between the jubilee and the Olympics, later that year .... it&#039;s a pity:  the Queen taking part in the beach volleyball would have been a high spot for thousands.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust Raynsford to shoot his mouth off.  In Simon Hoggart&#8217;s Guardian sketch today he says that &#8220;we learned that there would be no link between the jubilee and the Olympics, later that year &#8230;. it&#8217;s a pity:  the Queen taking part in the beach volleyball would have been a high spot for thousands.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Goldman</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/02510-greenwich-becomes-royal-borough/comment-page-1/#comment-12506</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=2510#comment-12506</guid>
		<description>Conferring Royal status on Greenwich is indeed great news.  It is, however, ironic that 2012 is the year when Greenwich Park is due to be used (or, more accurately, abused) for the Olympic equestrian events.   I wonder what the Queen really thinks about this most inappropriate use of one of the Royal Parks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conferring Royal status on Greenwich is indeed great news.  It is, however, ironic that 2012 is the year when Greenwich Park is due to be used (or, more accurately, abused) for the Olympic equestrian events.   I wonder what the Queen really thinks about this most inappropriate use of one of the Royal Parks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary F</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/02510-greenwich-becomes-royal-borough/comment-page-1/#comment-12501</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=2510#comment-12501</guid>
		<description>I note that Raynsford has to get the plug in about the Olympics....yawn
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note that Raynsford has to get the plug in about the Olympics&#8230;.yawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/02510-greenwich-becomes-royal-borough/comment-page-1/#comment-12477</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=2510#comment-12477</guid>
		<description>Took enough time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took enough time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
