<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woolwich Ferry may be tolled as new river crossings proposed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/woolwich-ferry-tolls-proposed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/woolwich-ferry-tolls-proposed/</link>
	<description>Greenwich news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/woolwich-ferry-tolls-proposed/comment-page-1/#comment-54866</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=1602#comment-54866</guid>
		<description>The entire notion of &quot;subsidising&quot; is a fallacy. Efficient capitalist countries like Germany recognise there is a net economic benefit to improving public transport. 

Unfortunately in this country the lobbyists who influence government behaviour encourage them to give subsidies or support to banks, to housebuilding, to supermarkets and other private interests. This is the reason a nation that once led the way in this area is languishing behind. 

The talk of &quot;freeloaders&#039; on the public transport system is also nonsense; pensioners use primarily buses, and outside peak hours these are not as full as the trains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entire notion of &#8220;subsidising&#8221; is a fallacy. Efficient capitalist countries like Germany recognise there is a net economic benefit to improving public transport. </p>
<p>Unfortunately in this country the lobbyists who influence government behaviour encourage them to give subsidies or support to banks, to housebuilding, to supermarkets and other private interests. This is the reason a nation that once led the way in this area is languishing behind. </p>
<p>The talk of &#8220;freeloaders&#8217; on the public transport system is also nonsense; pensioners use primarily buses, and outside peak hours these are not as full as the trains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Lawson</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/woolwich-ferry-tolls-proposed/comment-page-1/#comment-54852</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=1602#comment-54852</guid>
		<description>Public transport prices are high in London for three reasons:

1. The public is generally unwilling to subsidise public transport via taxes (and why should they - it means you and I paying for somebody elses personal trips when they should pay for them themselves). Continentals take a different view. Mayor Boris Johnson has been trying to put some more sense into London&#039;s transport budgets and that is why fares have risen recently, but they are still massively subsidised.

2. There are enormous numbers of &quot;freeloaders&quot; on the public transport system - such as pensioners who often could afford to pay. On some routes, 50% of travellers pay nothing.

3. It has been inefficiently managed for a number of years, and new transport projects get built that are simply uneconomic and will never pay for themselves (Crossrail and HS2 are good examples).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Public transport prices are high in London for three reasons:</p>
<p>1. The public is generally unwilling to subsidise public transport via taxes (and why should they &#8211; it means you and I paying for somebody elses personal trips when they should pay for them themselves). Continentals take a different view. Mayor Boris Johnson has been trying to put some more sense into London&#8217;s transport budgets and that is why fares have risen recently, but they are still massively subsidised.</p>
<p>2. There are enormous numbers of &#8220;freeloaders&#8221; on the public transport system &#8211; such as pensioners who often could afford to pay. On some routes, 50% of travellers pay nothing.</p>
<p>3. It has been inefficiently managed for a number of years, and new transport projects get built that are simply uneconomic and will never pay for themselves (Crossrail and HS2 are good examples).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/woolwich-ferry-tolls-proposed/comment-page-1/#comment-54850</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=1602#comment-54850</guid>
		<description>The grammar may be faulty but the logic is sound. More Thames crossings will mean more people switch to their cars rather than public transport, there will therefore be more traffic on the roads and more pollution. 

London&#039;s public transport lags behind many European capital cities - while prices are significantly higher. This issue should be addressed, rather than simply pushing more cars on to the roads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The grammar may be faulty but the logic is sound. More Thames crossings will mean more people switch to their cars rather than public transport, there will therefore be more traffic on the roads and more pollution. </p>
<p>London&#8217;s public transport lags behind many European capital cities &#8211; while prices are significantly higher. This issue should be addressed, rather than simply pushing more cars on to the roads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Lawson</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/woolwich-ferry-tolls-proposed/comment-page-1/#comment-54847</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=1602#comment-54847</guid>
		<description>These ungrammatical comments might have been written by a ten year old, and bearing in mind the wild exaggerations and spurious claims that they contain, they probably were. There is an urgent need for more cross-river crossings in East London so as to meet public demand and improve the economy of those parts of the capital. If they are not provided, then traffic congestion will get worse and pollution levels will increase. New crossings can be provided with minimal or no impact on air pollution levels, as was very clear from the TGB proposals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These ungrammatical comments might have been written by a ten year old, and bearing in mind the wild exaggerations and spurious claims that they contain, they probably were. There is an urgent need for more cross-river crossings in East London so as to meet public demand and improve the economy of those parts of the capital. If they are not provided, then traffic congestion will get worse and pollution levels will increase. New crossings can be provided with minimal or no impact on air pollution levels, as was very clear from the TGB proposals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew bond</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/woolwich-ferry-tolls-proposed/comment-page-1/#comment-54779</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=1602#comment-54779</guid>
		<description>sir i do not live in the london area but live in kent i do not agree to the right of boris johnson s comments regarding river crossing in the east of london ,not only is he a failure to the people of london with his crossing proposal s that will produce more pollution with in the london area ,it will also cause more pollution on the kent side of the river,this will affect the air quality of a large part of the population on both side s of the river ,and cause a significant increase of respiratory born illness within this area ,will he be prepared to put by a considerable amount of money to pay for the medical care these people will require ,and also pay compensation to these same people for the discomfort this will cause ,along with his fool hardy idea of polluting the air further with his plan for a new airport in the thames estuary do,s he not realise that again this will be built and pollute this same area more so ,maybe we should build this all in his back garden and then it will be no lost to us if it is only him that then suffers from the air pollution ,noise pollution ,and all associated problems these plans will produce for centurys to come .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sir i do not live in the london area but live in kent i do not agree to the right of boris johnson s comments regarding river crossing in the east of london ,not only is he a failure to the people of london with his crossing proposal s that will produce more pollution with in the london area ,it will also cause more pollution on the kent side of the river,this will affect the air quality of a large part of the population on both side s of the river ,and cause a significant increase of respiratory born illness within this area ,will he be prepared to put by a considerable amount of money to pay for the medical care these people will require ,and also pay compensation to these same people for the discomfort this will cause ,along with his fool hardy idea of polluting the air further with his plan for a new airport in the thames estuary do,s he not realise that again this will be built and pollute this same area more so ,maybe we should build this all in his back garden and then it will be no lost to us if it is only him that then suffers from the air pollution ,noise pollution ,and all associated problems these plans will produce for centurys to come .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayor wants Greenwich to Silvertown tunnel within ten years &#124; Greenwich.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/woolwich-ferry-tolls-proposed/comment-page-1/#comment-53080</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayor wants Greenwich to Silvertown tunnel within ten years &#124; Greenwich.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=1602#comment-53080</guid>
		<description>[...] crossing at Silvertown and the Gallion&#8217;s Reach ferry both featured in a TFL document published in 2009 that put forward plans for future river [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] crossing at Silvertown and the Gallion&#8217;s Reach ferry both featured in a TFL document published in 2009 that put forward plans for future river [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Barker</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/woolwich-ferry-tolls-proposed/comment-page-1/#comment-51609</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Barker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=1602#comment-51609</guid>
		<description>A Thamesmead bridge ia no no due to planes on final to runway 27 to Ciity Airport,
 however a tunnel would be ideal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Thamesmead bridge ia no no due to planes on final to runway 27 to Ciity Airport,<br />
 however a tunnel would be ideal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR.M.A.HAKIM</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/woolwich-ferry-tolls-proposed/comment-page-1/#comment-51588</link>
		<dc:creator>DR.M.A.HAKIM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 14:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=1602#comment-51588</guid>
		<description>As I said before, I like to have a bridge or tunnell built from Thamesmead to London borough of Newham.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said before, I like to have a bridge or tunnell built from Thamesmead to London borough of Newham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR.M.A.HAKIM</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/woolwich-ferry-tolls-proposed/comment-page-1/#comment-51569</link>
		<dc:creator>DR.M.A.HAKIM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=1602#comment-51569</guid>
		<description>See above my comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See above my comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR.M.A.HAKIM</title>
		<link>http://www.greenwich.co.uk/news/woolwich-ferry-tolls-proposed/comment-page-1/#comment-51568</link>
		<dc:creator>DR.M.A.HAKIM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenwich.co.uk/?p=1602#comment-51568</guid>
		<description>My house is in central Thames mead. I find it very hard to come to Blackwell tunnell or Woolwichferry to cross from Thamesmead to come to london for various reasons. It take long time to cross the river Thames. As there are lot of developments taken place  and many houses built in and around Thamesmead area it is very essential and very urgent to build a permanent tunnelling or over bridge in these areas.I am a great supporter of TGB or equivalent to safe times and troubles to drive from Thamesmead to the city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My house is in central Thames mead. I find it very hard to come to Blackwell tunnell or Woolwichferry to cross from Thamesmead to come to london for various reasons. It take long time to cross the river Thames. As there are lot of developments taken place  and many houses built in and around Thamesmead area it is very essential and very urgent to build a permanent tunnelling or over bridge in these areas.I am a great supporter of TGB or equivalent to safe times and troubles to drive from Thamesmead to the city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

