Greenwich.co.uk

Greenwich news and information

  • News
  • Sport
  • Blogs
  • Hotels in Greenwich
    • Serviced Apartments in Greenwich
  • Visiting
    • Things to Do in Greenwich
  • Greenwich Books
  • Greenwich Collectibles
  • Events
    • Add an Event

Labour councillors to elect leader next week

March 14, 2012 By Rob Powell

LABOUR councillors on Greenwich Council will hold internal elections next week to decide who they want as their leader.

Current leader, Chris Roberts, is expected to face competition for the job from his cabinet colleague, John Fahy, as was first reported earlier this week by the News Shopper.

Other senior positions within the group, such as the deputy leadership and cabinet jobs, will also be determined by secret ballot at the Annual General Meeting, due to be held at the Town Hall on Monday evening.

As the ruling group on the council, the winner of the Labour group leadership will also become the Leader of the Council.

Chris Roberts has been the Labour group leader, and Leader of the Council, for over a decade and represents the Glyndon ward.

John Fahy was elected to the council in 1990 and is currently the cabinet member in charge of Culture and the Olympics and is a councillor in the Woolwich Riverside ward.

 

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Chris Roberts, Cllr John Fahy

Interview with Cllr John Fahy – Part Two

May 5, 2011 By Rob Powell

Greenwich’s regal connections will come to the fore next year when it becomes a royal borough. As the man in charge of the council’s culture portfolio, is Cllr Fahy proud of this honour?

“I am very proud of it – notwithstanding Henry VIII’s activities in Ireland and all of that, forget all that,” the County Cork-born councillor says, “It’s just an enormous benefit for the borough. It’s long overdue.

“We are a World Heritage Site, home of time and all of that. It’s a joy that we’ve been able to get it, and again it’s because of the hard work of the leadership of the council in pushing that agenda forward.”

Is a new logo for the borough in the offing?

“I think there’s some work going on but that’s under wraps at the moment. We have to fit into the palace agenda.”

But the bigger story for 2012 is the Olympics. Cllr Fahy is himself looking forward to the swimming, equestrian and shooting events and is in the lottery for tickets.

How does he think preparations for the events being staged in Greenwich are going?

“Absolutely terrific. It’s interesting that the silent majority are totally enthused about the Olympics and I just find it fascinating that there’s this hard core of objectors around Greenwich Park who are a serious minority.

“It’ll just be amazing…  the millions of people that will see the iconic vista from the top of the Wolfe statue right down, it will just be amazing.”

One of the angriest press releases I’ve seen from Greenwich Council, I tell him, came when the ticket allocation for local children was announced. Was he disappointed with what was available for local kids?

“In reality, we continue to press… our ambition is to secure a ticket to some event during the Olympics for every school child in the borough.

“Whether we achieve that or not will depend on a whole range of things. They’d be able to tell their children and grandchildren ‘I was there in 2012’. As people were saying in 1948, ‘I was there’.”

Cllr Fahy raises the idea of staging a concert in Greenwich Park in August, between the Olympic and Paralympic games.

“There is an opportunity between the  Olympics and Paralympics to use Greenwich Park. There’ll be a stadium in there which will be kitted out so what the hell, why can’t we use it?

“Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we had Bono in Greenwich Park in 2012? It’s a space that’s there and we need to talk to LOCOG and the police and all that about it to see if it’s possible to use it. It’s a thought.

“It would be a promoter coming in and we would be helping to facilitate it. We wouldn’t be dipping into our pockets.”

With next year set to be huge for Greenwich’s Mr 2012, there’s still a few highlights in this year’s cultural calendar to discuss.

News of a new addition to the Greenwich Festival season, the Peninsula Festival, first surfaced on the 853 blog. It is the brainchild of entrepreneur Frank Dekker and is due to run on the peninsula for several years, including the creation of a temporary beach.

Fahy welcomes the start-up’s plans.

“We are engaged in facilitating and enabling organisations and companies to flourish, and giving a helping hand.”

“I think it’s helped where private sector organisations come in, set themselves up in Greenwich and establish the peninsula as a cultural destination of choice for people who want to enjoy themselves. I think it will be just great.”

Cllr Fahy is especially interested in plans to bring tall ships to Greenwich in 2012, having been to a tall ships festival himself in Amsterdam – “it wasn’t a council jolly”, he is quick to point out.

“There was something like two million people in Amsterdam during that weekend. Absolutely amazing. If we can create that kind of opportunity within the Peninsula, it could become a vibrant place.”

Cllr Fahy tells me he is “very excited” by the National Maritime Museum’s new Sammy Ofer wing, which is due to open later this year.

“Full credit to Kevin Fewster and the team for achieving their objective of getting the building on time and it will be bring enormous additional value to Greenwich.”

But what does he think of the NMM’s decision to charge £10 to stand on the Meridian Line at the Old Royal Observatory?

“Well, I think it’s a bit of an overkill.”

Would he pay £10 to stand on the Meridian Line?

“No.”

Could a £10 charge to stand on the Meridian Line damage Greenwich’s reputation in the eyes of visitors?

“Yeah.”

He is clearly not comfortable criticising the decision and his answers are noticeably shorter. He does, however, say he understands that “what they’re trying to do is increase their income”.

The missing link for visitors to Greenwich at the moment is the Cutty Sark. The restoration of the famous tea clipper is nearing completion. But the council has had to find £3million to help rescue the project.

Is he convinced there would be sufficient return on the council’s investment?

“Absolutely. You guys may get a sense that the council sometimes feels like a cash machine and we just give away money.  There’s lots of discussion and debate and analysis before we make any decision.

“It needs to be recognised that we have high levels of deprivation and unemployment, so the council has a role to provide opportunities though investment to maximise employment opportunities.

“The £3 million will have achieved an important development in terms of the Cutty Sark in the longer term. It will stabilise the town centre and increase tourism income and everybody will benefit. That’s the role of the council as it attempts to regenerate its areas.”

What came through during the interview was Fahy’s enthusiasm and optimism for Greenwich’s cultural offerings over the next 18 months and beyond.

With his cabinet responsibilities touching upon many of the issues that local people care most passionately about, he will be under the spotlight to ensure that the end results match his optimism.

Read Part One of this interview

Filed Under: Magazine Tagged With: Cllr John Fahy, Interview

Interview with Cllr John Fahy – Part One

May 4, 2011 By Rob Powell

As I sat down opposite Cllr John Fahy, I remarked that this would not be the first time his words would be recorded this week.

Our interview was taking place a few days after local journalist Darryl Chamberlain broke new ground by posting audio clips from the council chamber onto the internet.

But Cllr Fahy was not bothered by his sudden appearance online.

“It’s important we keep up with modern day communication strategies so I haven’t any hang ups about it,” he said.

“The council meetings are a public venue where people come along, quite rightly, and represent their interests and the interests of their community.

“We have the press there who can take notes, so what’s the difference, really?”

His relaxed outlook on what may prove to be an important step forward for council transparency is not atypical for the genial Irishman.

Hailing from a small village east of Cork, John Fahy moved to the UK at the end of the 1950s. He first made his home in Guildford, where he started a career in the trade union movement.

He moved to London in 1987 and was first elected to Greenwich Council three years later. He has been the cabinet member responsible for culture, including the Olympics, for four years.

We met at the café in East Greenwich Pleasaunce, a park he describes as “absolutely wonderful”. Getting people back into parks is one of his priorities – and cafés have a big role to play.

“I became interested in creating an environment whereby the parks would be successful if we had cafés so people had an opportunity to come, walk their dog or play sport.

“Having a café here also has the element of security because people are here, the staff are here and so it brings it all together in a positive way.

“We’ve got this café, we’ve got a café in Eltham Park South, we’ve got Avery Hill and we’ve been discussing the prospect of a café in St Alfege Park”.

“It will probably mean converting an existing building and we’re working with the friends of the park to achieve that.”

The improvements at  the pleasaunce in recent years have seen it handed a prestigious Green Flag Award.

Greenwich Council has five-and-a-half Green Flag parks – the half being Blackheath, shared with Lewisham. Does he have ambitions to increase Greenwich’s Green Flag tally?

“We’re aiming for twelve by 2012 but obviously we want to create more. For instance, the Friends of St Alfege Park are talking of achieving Green Flag status by 2013/14 so the Green Flag parks will continue in a very positive away”.

But with Greenwich lagging behind Lewisham – which already has 12 and a half Green Flag parks – is there a sense of competition with neighbouring boroughs?

“No, no, no – I talk a lot with my counterparts in Lewisham and Bexley so we’re up to speed with what others are doing but it’s not competitive in that sense.”

Greenwich and Lewisham had worked together for many years on the Blackheath firework display, but Greenwich abandoned the event at short notice in 2010. Lewisham was left to set up a public appeal to cover the shortfall.

Had he apologised to his Lewisham counterpart or been embarrassed at the way it was handled?

He begins defensively.

“I’m very keen to talk about the future rather than the past.

“Human frailties exist in councillors as well as everywhere else really. It seems to me that we could have reflected further on what were doing.

“But I think you have to put it in the context that we knew that whichever government was in power post the election, that there was going to be cuts so we deliberately took a decision to find savings where we could and build up some resources so that when it came to the cuts, we had a bit of a fair wind to seek to minimise the effects.

“I think we did reasonably well in terms of that, unlike Lewisham who are now closing five libraries and a whole range of other things.”

Do the Blackheath fireworks have a future?

“It will be difficult,” he says.

“I think there’s a balance to be struck between the private sector contribution and the council contribution and I don’t think in terms of the fireworks that the balance is sufficient. We’re happy to support projects. but in the next few years it’s going to be about doing more for less.”

Lewisham is looking at closing libraries and Cllr Fahy is proud that Greenwich isn’t doing the same. But with any internet-connected computer able to access more information than most libraries, I wondered about the future for libraries, and if the trend for usership was up or down.

“Before the fire in the Eltham Centre, figures were going up. But because the library was closed for a few months, we’ve had problems.

“With the opening of the new Woolwich Library, there’s going to be a significant improvement in IT provision so therefore the balance between readership and all of that will change.

“We need to develop life-long learning centres where it’s not only about taking out a book, it’s about going to the library, researching, using the IT. Kids going in after school to do research, improving their knowledge and all of that. That’s the thing we need to develop.”

The tech-savvy councillor says he is keeping an eye on the effect the Kindle is having on e-book reading and says he is “very interested in the concept” of people able to download music at libraries.

The council’s claim that no libraries are closing in Greenwich has been called into question after the Kidbrooke Kite blog revealed the library at the Ferrier Estate was closing and wouldn’t be reopened or replaced.

“Yes, but I mean, the library in the Ferrier was only open two days a week. It’s a bloody awful place in terms of the quality of the books we have in there so it’s not fit for purpose.”

Cllr Fahy points to “extensive library provision in Eltham… and increasing space in Woolwich”.

“The amount of floor space for libraries has increased dramatically across the borough,  and of course we’ve put significant investment in.”

Our meeting came just after the council increased the cost of tennis at its courts in line with inflation and, more controversially, decided to extend the enforcement of charging to Plumstead Common.

Local players were surprised to learn of the charges when a notice appeared and the courts were padlocked shut.

The councillor is aware of the criticisms that had surfaced on local blogs and a popular tennis website and anticipates my question.

Could he clarify the situation?

“Let me say this. The charges have only increased by the rate of inflation. The charges have always been there.

“But we have to look at these issues in the round, really, and we are developing a tennis strategy as we have been around a whole range of sports.”

He says the council is looking at ways to develop tennis across the borough and to create an elite tennis squad.

“Why can’t we provide opportunities for the next McEnroe or Murray to come from Greenwich or from Woolwich?

“But what we want to create is an opportunity for people, which has been the case for years at Plumstead, whereby mum and dad and the kids with a tennis racket and a few balls can come out and have some time on the courts.

“Would we charge for that? I doubt it because we would have to someone sitting there all day.

“I didn’t know the signs at Plumstead were going up. Was I aware, I would have probably said, well, you know, ‘we know what the score is’.”

It sounds like there won’t be an immediate change to the situation at Plumstead, I say.

He agrees, adding he was unaware of the courts being padlocked shut.

“Why do we need to wind people up like that? This is a tough call for all of us in terms of trying to achieve budget reductions.

“We don’t want to persecute people, we want to work with them to improve our sports.”

“Councils work like a bureaucracy and we need to be mindful… it is about collecting money but it’s also about making sure that we increase the number of people participating and if the barrier is one of finance, then we need to be flexible.”

Cllr Fahy says the council does need to improve revenues from tennis, and as with the libraries, he has an eye on greater use of technology.

“We have to find ways to maximising income within a flexible arrangement and I think a swipe card may be one way of doing it.

“We need to have different charges for different areas. The Greenwich Card may become a swipe card so a person who wants to engage in tennis can join on an annual basis, swipe their card and play.”

Read Part Two of this interview

Filed Under: Magazine Tagged With: Cllr John Fahy, Interview

“Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we had Bono in Greenwich Park in 2012?”

May 3, 2011 By Rob Powell

Greenwich Council’s cabinet member for Culture and the Olympics has raised the prospect of a concert being held in Greenwich Park next year.

Speaking to Greenwich.co.uk, Cllr John Fahy has proposed using London 2012’s temporary stadium for a cultural event during the gap between the Olympic and Paralympic equestrian events.

“Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we had Bono in Greenwich Park in 2012?”, he says in the interview for this website which will be published in two parts beginning tomorrow. The proposal is in its infancy and would require the agreement of London 2012 organisers before it could go ahead.

“It’s a space that’s there and we need to talk to LOCOG and the police … to see if it’s possible to use it”, he says.

Elsewhere in the interview, he:

  • Reveals his ambition to secure a ticket to an Olympic event for every child in the borough.
  • Says he has “no hang ups” about council meetings being recorded and put online.
  • Sets a target of 12 Green Flag Award winning parks in Greenwich by 2012.
  • Calls the decision to charge £10 to stand on the Meridian Line at the Royal Observatory “overkill”.
  • Backs away from plans to enforce charging for tennis at Plumstead Common in the short term.

Part one of Greenwich.co.uk’s interview with Cllr John Fahy will be published on Greenwich.co.uk tomorrow.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Cllr John Fahy, Greenwich Park

More local parks get Green Flag Award

August 2, 2010 By Rob Powell

Green Flag Award

The borough of Greenwich has increased its tally of Green Flag awarded parks in the latest winners list which has just been announced.

East Greenwich Pleasaunce, Blackheath (in association with Lewisham), Well Hall Pleasaunce and Sutcliffe Park all retained their Green Flags, with Horn Park and Eltham Parks North & South getting the honour for the first time.

Cllr John Fahy, Cabinet Member for Culture and the Olympics commented “I’m really pleased that six of our parks have been rewarded with a Green Flag Award.”

Greenwich Park, which is under the control of the Royal Parks Agency rather than the council, also had its Green Flag renewed.

The ‘Green Flag Award Scheme’ recognises and rewards the best green spaces in the country

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Cllr John Fahy, East Greenwich Pleasaunce, Greenwich Park

I was airbrushed out of Greenwich Time, claims councillor

July 29, 2010 By Rob Powell

A Conservative councillor has told a council meeting that she was airbrushed out of an edition of the controversial weekly council newspaper, Greenwich Time.

The claim was made by councillor Eileen Glover during a debate at Wednesday night’s full meeting of the council at Woolwich Town Hall.

The councillor for the Eltham South ward told the meeting that she had ensured she was in all the photos taken by Greenwich Time at an event in her ward attended by the Council Leader but by the time it went to print, she had been “airbrushed out”.

She was only able to make an appearance in a later edition by changing her hair so that she was unrecognisable to the Leader of the Council, she said.

The debate over Greenwich Time was prompted after Greenwich Conservatives put forward a motion calling for weekly production of the newspaper to be ended.

Cllr Nigel Fletcher (Conservative, Eltham North) questioned whether the newspaper offered value for money and asked if it could really be considered a “front line service”. He expressed his doubts over the impartiality of the publication before mocking the content in this week’s edition.

“Is it really a core function of this council to provide, for example, a review of Toy Story 3? Do we really have a duty to inform our residents … that Prince’s new album is his most ‘soulless yet’?”, he asked. He said ending the weekly printing of Greenwich Time would be an “easy cut”.

Cllr Maureen O’Mara (Labour, Greenwich West) commented that Greenwich Time’s council property pages were “very important” to residents who wanted to move, describing it as providing an “essential service” for those that couldn’t or wouldn’t get the  information online.

Cllr Dermot Poston (Conservative, Eltham North) told colleagues that he regarded it as a “political newspaper” and that he “bitterly resents” it. He said the ruling party have “lost any sense of fairness and democracy”.

Cllr Matt Clare (Conservative, Eltham South) used his maiden speech at a full council meeting to say how he would frequently see “No Greenwich Time” notices whilst going door to door during the election campaign. He asked why only Greenwich and Tower Hamlets were delivering newspapers on a weekly basis if it had “such demonstrable benefits”.

Cllr John Fahy (Labour, Woolwich Riverside) reminded fellow councillors that the Conservatives “fought the election on the arguments of Greenwich Time and lost”. He criticised local freesheet, the News Shopper, for printing “10 pages of stories in Lewisham and beyond, and perhaps 2 or 3 stories about the community in Greenwich”.  He said that in raising the issue, it was “payback time” for the opposition because during the election, the “News Shopper was the extension of Conservative news”.

West Greenwich councillor, David Grant (Labour) also suggested that he had been “airbrushed out” of a Greenwich Time photo but said that because of the cabinet system of the council, it was inevitable most of the coverage would be on the executive although he said would like to see more backbenchers featured.

The Leader of the Council, Cllr Chris Roberts (Labour, Glyndon), said that in strict terms, Greenwich Time is “not a political newspaper” and nor could it be according to the law. In fact, council lawyers check it line by line before it goes to print, he revealed.

Cllr Roberts said the paper was “very close to being self financing” and that the cost of producing it had fallen from 22p per copy to just 3.5p per copy. “We are already making significant savings which run into the hundreds of thousands of pounds”, he added.

He said it was “absolutely right that we should prioritise our spending” but printing Greenwich Time meant the Council was “able to deliver statutory notices almost at no cost”.

The Conservative motion was defeated.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Chris Roberts, Cllr David Grant, Cllr Dermot Poston, Cllr Eileen Glover, Cllr John Fahy, Cllr Matt Clare, Cllr Maureen O'Mara, Cllr Nigel Fletcher, Greenwich Council, Greenwich Time

Andrew Gilligan: Local News – The “Greenwich Time” Way

April 28, 2010 By Andrew Gilligan

THE DAY that Greenwich Council’s propaganda newspaper, Greenwich Time, announced the BRILLIANT news that this is to become a royal borough, it seemed only right to put a picture of the monarch on the front page.

No, silly, not that absurd interloper, the Queen. She was rightly relegated to page 3. Page 1 was reserved for the traditional anvil-jawed photo of our very own age-old symbol of pomp and majesty, council leader Chris Roberts. “Residents, businesses and the millions of visitors to Greenwich will share in our delight at this wonderful news,” said King Chris (note the use of the royal we.) That issue was billed as a “souvenir edition.” But for Mr Roberts, every edition of Greenwich Time is a souvenir!

Inspired by a discussion this week on greenwich.co.uk, I went through some recent back numbers of South London’s very own Court Circular, to see just how many times Mr Roberts and his Labour chums have been puffing themselves at our expense. And the results from the international jury are now in.

Total number of mentions of Labour politicians: 98.
Total number of mentions of non-Labour politicians: 0.
Total number of pictures of Labour politicians: 29.
Total number of pictures of non-Labour politicians: 0.

Mr Roberts, by the way, features on the front page in 8 out of the 12 issues I examined, often with a picture. And when, by some terrible oversight, he is left out of the front-page story, he nearly always gets a column and picture inside (“I was surprised to be told today that I will receive an award as the Greenest Leader in South London…”)

Other very special Greenwich Time stars include Greenwich West’s own Maureen O’Mara – who must, on this tally, be a bit worried about holding her seat – and John Fahy, never pictured without a shovel in his hand. And we mustn’t forget Nick Raynsford MP. He might be hard to find on the streets of Greenwich, but he makes up for it in Greenwich Time. Lib Dems? Tories? Greens? You what?

There isn’t space here for a full list of all the Pravda-esque inanities of “the newspaper campaigning for a greater Greenwich,” but the one that made me laugh the loudest was the fearless scrutiny by one Nick Day of the council’s response to this winter’s snow.

“The extended spell of severe weather must have been testing the council’s resources to breaking point,” wrote Mr Day. “I’ve been frankly amazed at the impressive response…I’ve often been quick to hold the council to account, so I must be equally quick to praise the grit (sorry!) and determination that officers and workers have been applying to their immense task.”

You certainly should be sorry, Nick. Actually, I seem to remember that there was relatively little snow in south-east London by comparison with the rest of the country, and what there was was not cleared conspicuously effectively in Greenwich.

Some stories have been so good that Greenwich Time did them twice – like the one on falling bus crime and burglary figures, front-paged on both the 5th and 19th January (“Making you much SAFER”) and based on a possibly dodgy comparison. The shortage of space created by the repetition of such stories was no doubt why other news – like the excoriation of Greenwich’s social services as “shocking,” “arrogant” and “very poor” by a High Court judge – never made it into Greenwich Time.

My tally of councillor and MP mentions, by the way, covers less than three months’ worth of Greenwich Time, between 5 Jan and 23 March. Some vestigial respect for democratic decencies (or more likely the fear of court action for breaking electoral law) has kept the politicians out of the paper over the last month.

But, even during the election campaign, Greenwich Time has found a sneaky way to push the Labour message. The front page of the April 13 edition (“Spring in our step… Local businesses crack on despite the credit crunch”) told everyone that the “green shoots” of recovery were back: “Confidence [in Greenwich businesses] is growing by the day… There is a realisation that they have survived the abyss… Some businesses have sadly disappeared, but far fewer than may have been feared,” wrote the chair of the local chamber of commerce.

In the 1950s, as part of some dastardly imperial plot against the French, civil servants of the Colonial Office successfully persuaded the people of the Pacific island of Tanna to worship Prince Philip as a god. Portraits of the deity still hang in many a grass hut. Mr Roberts is clearly trying the same trick with what he believes to be the simple, credulous people of Greenwich. In me and others, the sheer clumsiness of the operation has had the opposite effect – making me automatically mistrust everything the council does, even if it is worthwhile.

The Tories are promising, if elected to the council, to close down Greenwich Time, which sounds like a good idea. This ridiculous apology for a newspaper has become the prime symbol of a council that treats its citizens like idiots.

Filed Under: Andrew Gilligan Tagged With: Cllr John Fahy, Greenwich Time

Call for clarity over East Greenwich Library

March 9, 2010 By Rob Powell

Dave Sharman, a Green Party candidate for the Peninsula ward, has written to Greenwich Council asking for assurances that East Greenwich Library will not be closed.

The library, donated to the community by philanthropist Andrew Carnegie, is also home to Greenwich Community College’s Meridian Music Centre.

Greenwich Community College is currently undertaking a consultation process on the courses it can afford to offer after it had a 10% cut imposed on its “Adult Learner Responsive” budget this year.

The review involves all aspects of the college, including the Meridian Music Centre, although local Greens claim that staff have already been told the music centre will close at the end of this academic year.

Dave Sharman commented: “I hope the music college’s planned closure is not part of a wider project to do away with the library by stealth – the people of East Greenwich will not stand for that”

Cllr John Fahy, Greenwich Cabinet Member for Culture and Olympics, commented that “the Scheme [to refurbish the library] and Estimate is being costed and work will commence shortly“.

He added that he would continue to work with the Friends of East Greenwich Library and Ward Councillors “to maximise a long term future for the building“.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Cllr John Fahy, Woolwich Road

Greenwich Council Meeting 16/12/09: Roadworks, Foot Tunnel, John Roan School & Charlton Lido

December 17, 2009 By Darryl Chamberlain

Greenwich Council has said it wants to join a scheme which will enable it to co-ordinate roadworks in the borough, after a year which has seen serious disruption on Greenwich roads.

Works by Southern Gas Networks and Thames Water have caused traffic to grind to a halt through Greenwich town centre, while Charlton and Blackheath have also been seriously affected by a water main replacement programme.

The issue was highlighted by greenwich.co.uk’s Andrew Gilligan in November after it emerged the council had not joined a Transport for London scheme, under which utilities have to get permits from local authorities before they dig up roads.

Deputy leader Peter Brooks told last night’s Greenwich Council meeting he wanted the borough to join the programme.

In a written answer to Liberal Democrat councillor Brian Woodcraft, who asked why Greenwich was not part of the scheme, he said: “I am very keen for Greenwich to participate in this scheme, and I hope the trial will be expanded for us to be able to do so very soon.”

However, he not answer why the council had not joined the scheme, and Cllr Woodcraft did not press him on the issue.

Lewisham and Bromley councils are involved in the TfL programme, which is due to come into force next year.

Greenwich Foot Tunnel

A petition signed by 1,000 users of Greenwich foot tunnel demanding that closures be kept to a minimum when it is refurbished was presented to the council by Liberal Democrat member Paul Webbewood.

The river crossing, together with its sister tunnel at Woolwich, is due to be refurbished by 2012, with regular users fearing lengthy closures.

Council leader Chris Roberts told the meeting a contractor had been appointed to carry out the works.

“We’re discussing what work needs to be done and what the hours will be,” he said.

“Then we can advise residents and businesses on arrangements for both tunnels.”

John Roan School

Greenwich Council confirmed it would respect John Roan School governors’ decision not to move to a new site on Greenwich Peninsula.

Blackheath Westcombe Conservative councillor Alex Wilson asked if a timetable had been set out for works to improve John Roan’s existing sites on Maze Hill and Westcombe Park Road.

But children’s services cabinet member Jackie Smith said the proposals were still in the “developmental stage”.

“It is too early to be definitive about completion dates, but will will want to ensure that the project is progressed as quickly as practicable.”

Charlton Lido

Conservative leader Spencer Drury criticised the council for not giving an update on works at Charlton Lido, which is being converted into a diving centre.

Earlier this year his party colleague, Kidbrooke with Hornfair councillor Graeme Coombes, presented a 222-strong petitioning demanding the reopening of the lido for the summer season.

It had been closed in anticipation of leasing the lido out to private firm Open Waters Investments, which is due to re-open the pool by summer 2012.

But the lease was not signed until 14 August, leaving the lido empty for the summer.

Responding to the petition, the council said it would have taken leisure operator GLL two weeks to mobilise its staff, and that opening hours at another centre would have to be cut to staff Charlton Lido.

Cllr Drury called the reply “disappointing”. “I hoped there would have been an update on whether work has started,” he told the meeting.

But Olympics and culture cabinet member John Fahy said he saw no reason to doubt that the revamped lido would open on time.

New Trees in Greenwich

If you think your street would benefit from having some new trees, then Greenwich Council wants to hear from you.

The council is spending £4.8m on planting 2,012 trees in the borough to mark the Olympics, with planting due to take place next winter.

In response to a public question from the Greenwich Environment Forum’s Anna Townend, Olympics and culture cabinet member John Fahy told the meeting the council was looking for places to put the trees in.

“We’ve been consulting with residents for a number of weeks, particularly at our Great Get-Together events,” he said.

Cllr Fahy added that he did not think that a new woodland would be created with the trees.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Cllr John Fahy, Greenwich Council, Greenwich Foot Tunnel, John Roan School, Roadworks

Andrew Gilligan: Huge Majority Oppose Greenwich Olympics

October 20, 2009 By Andrew Gilligan

HIGHLY-controversial plans to hold the Olympic horse events in Greenwich Park are opposed by almost 70 per cent of local residents, the first full-scale survey has found. The survey, by the London Assembly, is a serious blow to the Olympic organisers, who have always claimed – without any apparent evidence – that the horseriding event is popular.

John Fahy, Greenwich Council’s cabinet member for culture and the Olympics, said at a public meeting in March: “The Olympics in the Park have universal support.” Lord Coe, the chair of Locog, described opponents of the use of the Park as “minority voices.”

But nobody has actually known what local people think – until now. And it turns out that, in a less-than surprise development, both Greenwich Council and London 2012 have been talking out of their bottoms.

Almost 12,000 survey forms were posted or emailed to most households in the three Greenwich Council wards around the Park. 1,267 were returned – a very high response given that the respondents had to pay their own postage, and a bigger sample than in most professionally-conducted opinion polls.

Three neutrally-worded questions were asked:

1. Are you in favour of the equestrian event being held in Greenwich Park during the 2012 Olympics?
No – 68% Yes – 31% Don’t know – 1%

2. Have you received any communication from the Mayor or Locog about the possible impacts of the proposed venue within Greenwich Park?
No – 90% Yes- 10%

3. Have you been invited to or attended any public meetings regarding the equestrian competition to be held in Greenwich Park?
No – 78% Yes – 22%

Many respondents made heartfelt comments. “Our park is a rare haven of peace…I am horrified that such a short-term, temporary, status-ridden excitement can threaten the calm and spiritual nature of such a well-needed refuge for Londoners,” wrote one.

“I am fully in support of the Olympics generally, but… the changes required to Greenwich Park…seem disproportionate to the benefit of holding the event in the Park,” said another.

“There is clearly very strong feeling about this,” said Gareth Bacon, the Tory assembly member who co-ordinated the survey. “What it tells me is that Locog have not really attempted to connect at all with the people of Greenwich.”

Lord Coe will be questioned on the survey results by Assembly members today on a day which also sees the opening of London 2012’s temporary “consultation” exhibition in a vacant town centre shop (on College Approach, between Rhodes Bakery and the Admiral Hardy.)

However, the London Assembly survey provides a rather more thorough form of consultation than anything the exhibition could achieve.

The results underline, once again, the futility of Locog’s attempts to “engage” the public through what we can now safely say are unrepresentative pro-Games groups like the Greenwich Society, which yet again finds itself on the wrong end of public opinion.

As Bacon says: “In the eyes of local residents, the public consultation on the equestrian event has been woeful. Locog must understand that holding big public events or giving presentations to local societies is no substitute for trying to build a direct picture of the concerns of the majority of residents.” In an attack on the Greenwich Society, he says: “Chairs of conservation societies don’t necessarily represent the views of the wider populace.”

To be fair, however, Locog has now started direct communication with the public. More detailed plans have been published on its new Greenwich Park microsite and many households, mine included, last week received a duplicated letter from Lord Coe outlining the opportunity to “have your say” on the plans. More on that next week.

This sort of communication, according to Locog’s spokeswoman, Jacqui Brock-Doyle, is how public opinion can be turned round. “I’m not surprised by the survey result,” she said. “What we’ve been finding in our own surveys, which are being carried out at the moment, is a huge amount of misinformation – that trees will be cut down, the park closed for a year, and so on. When we sit down and talk to people, we will get a significant change in what they think.”

I disagree with Brock-Doyle: I think that most people are reacting not to the scare stories but to what the event really involves (a cumulative ten-month closure of most of the lower Park, total closure for at least a month, tree pruning, the risk of serious damage, great disruption to the neighbourhood, no legacy or other benefits whatever for Greenwich.)

It could also, of course, be argued that those who sent back their survey forms are not necessarily representative. Those who are angry with the plans would perhaps take more trouble to respond.

But what it does clearly show is what I have always believed, that active, motivated enthusiasm for the Games in the Park locally is very close to nil. Even those who do want them don’t really want them with much passion.

Whatever you think of the survey, it makes the worst possible backdrop for Locog’s planning application, expected within the month. They’d hoped that the opposition was going away. But it isn’t.

Filed Under: Andrew Gilligan Tagged With: Cllr John Fahy, Greenwich Park, London 2012 Olympics

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »

Visit the Old Royal Naval College

Book tickets for the Old Royal Naval College

Recent Posts

  • Kevin Nolan’s Match Report: Charlton v Chelsea U-21 (29/10/24)
  • Kevin Nolan’s Match Report: Barnsley v Charlton (22/10/24)
  • Kevin Nolan’s Match Report: Bristol Rovers v Charlton (1/10/24)
  • Kevin Nolan’s Match Report: Cambridge United v Charlton (17/09/24)

Greenwich.co.uk © Uretopia Limited | About/Contact | Privacy Policy