Greenwich.co.uk

Greenwich news and information

Greenwich Council Meeting: 24th February 2010

By

Council-owned housing rent

Greenwich Councillors voted through a 1.6% rise in rents on Council homes in the borough at a full meeting of the Council last night.

The move – which will see average rents go up by £1.30 a week – was opposed by Conservative and Lib Dem councillors.

Cllr Graeme Coombes (Con, Kidbrooke with Hornfair) described the proposed increase as “unwarranted and unnecessary”.

Cllr Eileen Glover (Con, Eltham South) said “we should be good landlords. These are stringent times. We should not be putting up council rents at this time”.

Cllr Brian Woodcraft (Lib Dem, Middle Park and Sutcliffe) called the rise “totally unjustified”.

In defending the move, Council leader Chris Roberts (Lab, Peninsula) told councillors that there would be a “loss of subsidy to the council if rents don’t increase” because of the complex funding arrangements for Council owned housing stock.

Recycling

Conservative councillors put forward a motion asking for a commitment to the weekly black topped bin collection and opposing any introduction of “bin taxes”.

Cllr Spencer Dury (Con, Eltham North) told the meeting that whilst the recycling system had been “something of a success”, there was still “substantial concerns about incineration”.

Cllr Graeme Coombes (Con, Kidbrooke with Hornfair) said that collecting the bins was “one of the fundamental tasks in local government” and that any introduction of bin taxes would result in an increase in illegal fly tipping.

Leader of the Council, Cllr Chris Roberts, said the meeting had spent “45 minutes on a Tory motion that’s completely irrelevant” and that because of the council tax package previously voted for by councillors, “all bins will be collected on a weekly basis whether they are blue, black or green”.

Greenwich Foot Tunnel

The council’s formal response to a recent petition opposing the closure of Greenwich and Woolwich foot tunnels whilst renovation is undertaken contained details of the closure programme that is being proposed.

The works are likely to run from February 2010 to March 2011 and will see Greenwich Foot Tunnel closed weekday nights from 9.00pm to 6.00am.

Woolwich Foot Tunnel will have daytime closures from Monday to Friday. Consideration is being given to starting closures at 10.00am, and only on days when the Woolwich ferry is in operation.

Cutty Sark

Cllr Chris Roberts used a written answer to a question from Cllr Paul Webbewood (Lib Dem, Middle Park and Sutcliffe) to reject recent criticisms of the plan to suspend the famous tea clipper 11-feet off the ground as part of its restoration. He commented:

“The difference between the iconic scheme the council has supported and simply putting the Ship back together as was could not be greater. It will create an attraction which people will want to return to… it will host a range of uses as well as create a stunning visual backdrop to those wishing to visit Greenwich”.

Webcasting Council Meetings

Council leader Chris Roberts was asked by Cllr Nigel Fletcher (Con, Eltham North) about the possibility of webcasting Greenwich Council meetings – an idea which was last month approved by Lewisham Council after local Greens proposed it.

Roberts told the meeting he was fairly open minded but it perhaps reflected “an inflated sense of self importance in the chamber” if they thought people would switch off the football to watch council meetings.

Peninsula Chinese restaurant gets food hygiene fine

By

The Peninsula restaurant in Bugsby’s Way has been handed a fine of £13,500 by Woolwich Magistrates.

The hefty fine was issued last Monday after a number of food hygiene breaches were found in an unannounced inspection by Environmental Health officers at Greenwich Council.

During the inspection, officers found:

  • Dirty equipment, walls, floor and ventilation ducting in the kitchen
  • Food storage containers in a poor state of repair
  • Failure to protect food from contamination in the refrigerator
  • Inadequate procedures were put into place to control pests
  • Mouse droppings were found in the storage areas
  • General cleanliness of the premises was below standard

Peninsula restaurant, which is in the same building as the Express by Holiday Inn hotel, pleaded guilty to the offences and were charged £13,500 and ordered to pay the council’s costs of £6,800.

Councillor Maureen O’Mara, Greenwich Council’s Cabinet Member for neighbourhood services, said: “The Council will continue to carry out unannounced visits to food businesses and will take necessary action to safeguard customers’ health. It is essential that food businesses take all the appropriate steps to ensure general food hygiene standards are met”.


View Larger Map

Greenwich Hospital confirms Market appeal

By

Greenwich Hospital has confirmed that it will be appealing against the Council’s decision to reject its market regeneration plans.

The decision – first reported on this site yesterday by Andrew Gilligan – was relayed to traders at a meeting last night and confirmed by Greenwich Hospital in a press release this morning.

Greenwich Hospital will be asking the Planning Inspectorate to consider the same proposal that was unanimously rejected by Greenwich Council’s Planning Board last August.

Martin Sands, Director of Greenwich Hospital, said:

“The Hospital’s criteria for the regeneration of Greenwich Market has always been that any improvements to the Hospital’s properties in Greenwich town centre would need to:

  • Retain the diversity of shops and stalls.
  • Be architecturally, physically and financially viable.
  • Be capable of standing the test of time.
  • Be mindful of Greenwich’s status as a World Heritage Site and as a
  • Maritime Heritage Site.
  • Complement Greenwich’s unique position as a tourist and retail
  • destination.

Greenwich Hospital continues to believe that the market regeneration scheme which was not approved by Greenwich Council in August 2009 meets the above criteria.

Greenwich Hospital says that if permission is granted, work will not begin until 2013.

In an interview with Greenwich.co.uk last December, Nick Raynsford MP said “I think that if they appeal they have a very good chance of success“.

Update: A spokesperson for Greenwich Council has told Greenwich.co.uk:

The council will defend the unanimous decision of its Planning Board and would urge all residents who opposed the scheme to make representations to the planning inspectorate.

Council approves O2 as Olympic venue

By

The Planning Board of Greenwich Council gave permission last night for the O2 to be used as a venue at the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic games.

The dome, which will be known as the North Greenwich Arena at the time of the games, will play host to Artistic Gymnastics, Trampoline Gymnastics and the Basketball finals during the Olympic Games, followed by Wheelchair Basketball during the Paralympic Games.

The proposal got the unanimous backing of the Planning Board at last night’s meeting.

Sebastian Coe, Chairman of LOCOG said: “This is very good news and a vital step forward in our preparations for the Games. These venues are an important part of the cluster of sports being staged in Greenwich. North Greenwich Arena is without doubt an outstanding venue and will be a spectacular sporting stage in 2012.”

The Planning Board also unanimously supported the proposal to use Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich for shooting events at the 2012 Games.

Should Maze Hill station be renamed?

By

Maze Hill Train Station

The East Greenwich Cultural Corridor Committee are considering ideas for promoting East Greenwich. Here, Liz Wrigley puts forward the suggestion that Maze Hill station be renamed “East Greenwich station”

The station is very close to the East Greenwich area, and is the most convenient station for both the park and for the University, as well as servicing the shops on Trafalgar Road and other East Greenwich venues. As a mainline station is has a fast, regular service to London Bridge, where you can join the underground easily, get to Charing Cross (by changing platform) and to the south to connect to say Gatwick also by changing platform.

However at present visitors by rail get off, understandably, at Greenwich station (which is nearly half way to Deptford! It is a station that was the Greenwich stop on the original London to Greenwich route, way back in 1838 when this little Kent village first joined with the capital, before the tunnel under the museum and park was made and the route extended east, and has no other significance to its location or name).

No one would guess that Maze Hill is actually much closer to the Greenwich historical town centre attractions.  National Rail travel to here from central London is now on the oyster card system so you do not even need a separate ticket.

We are looking at a long term strategy to bring East Greenwich onto the mental map of the rest of London and the world, as at present it is overlooked, being just beyond the east edge of the World Heritage area, a place where at present maps may as well say ‘there be dragons here’.

In summary, the station is:

  • close to the park, with a park entrance very near
  • close to the Maritime Museum
  • close to the river Thames,
  • close to the town centre markets

Liz Wrigley
Planning  / Urban Design Consultant
East Greenwich Cultural Corridor Committee

What do you think? Would it be beneficial to East Greenwich if Maze Hill station was renamed? Have your say in the comments below.